This page is Under development, needs expanding, new points, and or Evidence.
Each objection point will have to relate to a policy document and if possible to a policy reference number.
Every objection should be supported by sound evidence, e.g. from other proven sources or the evidence collected by residences

  1. Green belt land is protected by national and local planning frameworks.
  2. There are brownfield sites and previously developed land (PDL) available.
  3. On going declining population within South Tyneside.
  4. Previous and projected employment land has not materialised the extra manufacturing jobs.
  5. Nature and wildlife. There is an direct effect include disturbance to breeding and wintering birds during construction. As well as birds, recorded observation note the confirmed presence on-site of various species, including some protected ones, such as: great crested newts, water voles, otters, bats, badgers, hazel dormice and hedgehogs. It is not clear if wider surveys have been carried out. The entire development site is also a designated “Wildlife Corridor” The site should not be built on, especially as other local wildlife corridors have been reduced through housing development.
  6. The site is an important amenity to the local community. It is an 6th generation farm, with stables for x horses. Development would stop the health and wellbeing benefits associated with the site which include walking, dog walking, access to nature and other activities. The last time development was proposed on this site, objections were lengthy and South Tyneside Council produced many documents stating that the land should not be developed.
  7. Whilst there are suggestions that additional services will be developed, historic developments have shown that service developments are the last part of the development and with developments expected to last 8 to 10 years, in the run up time there will be more pressure on schools and doctors. This assumes that they will actually be built. During the consultation, local residents expressed concerns about the increased pressure on schools and doctors in the local area. Increasing homes in the area by more than 1200 dwellings (2,400+ residents), will put further pressure on local services, negatively impacting the local residential amenities.
  8. Flooding The National Planning Policy Framework says: “Inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding should be avoided by directing development away from areas at highest risk (whether existing or future). Where development is necessary in such areas, the development should be made safe for its lifetime without increasing flood risk elsewhere.” (point 155). The site is at risk of flooding, it has been flooded several times in the past, remedial work has mitigated existing flooding, although there have been 2 significant floods in recent years, where residences have photographs to prove it. It is well documented that in Flood Zones 3 it would seem that development of this type of land would increase the flood risk both here and elsewhere in the local area. Recent extreme weather events tell us that we cannot ignore flood risks. Moreover, in their comments on the application, the environment agency objected to the plans on flood risk grounds first on the 27th July 2021 and even one year later on the 4th of August 2022. To see more information and images about the risk of flooding for this site
  9. Traffic and Congestion resulting from building 1200 homes. Key issues include increased vehicle traffic leading to longer commute times, higher fuel consumption, and more emissions. Construction itself will also contribute to traffic congestion, noise pollution, and air pollution through dust and exhaust emissions.
    1200 new homes mean a substantial increase in daily trips, leading to more cars on the road and potentially exceeding the capacity of existing infrastructure.
    Longer Commute Times: Increased traffic will mean longer travel times for all commuters, potentially leading to stress and reduced productivity.
    Higher Fuel Consumption: Traffic jams and slow speeds cause vehicles to consume more fuel, contributing to higher emissions.
  10. Air Pollution: Increased traffic emissions, particularly from diesel vehicles, contribute to poor air quality, including higher levels of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, and nitrogen dioxide.
  11. Noise Pollution: Construction activities and increased traffic volume will lead to higher noise levels, potentially affecting nearby residents and causing stress.
  12. Construction Dust and Emissions Excavation, and material transport during construction generate dust and pollutants that can affect air quality.
  13. Water Pollution: Construction activities, particularly if not managed properly, can lead to the release of pollutants into waterways.
  14. Light Pollution: Increased artificial lighting from the new development can affect nearby areas and wildlife.
  15. Construction-Specific Issues:
    Traffic Disruptions:
    Construction traffic can disrupt existing traffic flow and create further congestion, particularly during peak hours.
    Noise Pollution:
    Construction machinery and activities can create significant noise pollution, especially during night-time hours.
    Dust and Air Quality:
    Construction sites generate dust and emissions that can impact air quality in the surrounding area.